| Economy/WTO |
Back |
| Export subsidies: limits on spending
and quantities |
The Agriculture Agreement prohibits export
subsidies on agricultural products unless the subsidies are specified
in a member's lists of commitments. Where they are listed, the agreement
requires WTO members to cut both the amount of money they spend on
export subsidies and the quantities of exports that receive subsidies.
Taking averages for 1986-90 as the base level, developed countries
have agreed to cut the value of export subsidies by 36% over the six
years starting in 1995 (24% over 10 years for developing countries). |
Developed countries have also agreed to
reduce the quantities of subsidized exports by 21% over the six years
(14% over 10 years for developing countries). Least developed countries
do not need to make any cuts. During the six-year implementation period,
developing countries are allowed under certain conditions to use subsidies
to reduce the costs of marketing and transporting exports. |
From the above information, we can safely
conclude that very soon, the days of protection will be over and Indian
farmers, sooner than later, will have to contend with the forces of
liberalization and globalization in their own backyards. But does
this augur well for India? |
| Indian Agriculture : Caught in a bind |
India holds a position of eminence in WTO
discussions, especially in the agriculture sector. Thus it will not
be easy for the international community to design measures, which
hamper the prospects of Indian agriculture. Having said this, there
will certainly be some provisions in the WTO agreements, which might
have an adverse impact on Indian farm goods in the short term. The
Indian Government's response will be three-fold as specified in their
website : Food security of our people, protection of the interests
of domestic farmers & their livelihood as well as the need for export
maximisation will be the guiding principles during the ongoing negotiations. |
Thus, on the one hand though the Indian
government would like to see more Indian agri-exports, it cannot risk
the entry of cheaper agri-goods in India, for the fear of harming
Indian farmers. It is a balancing act and it will have to be performed,
not only by India, but also by other developing nations. |
The domestic marketing of agricultural
goods in India is loaded with problems : infrastructural inefficiencies,
low productivity levels, a plethora of middlemen, low quality and
lack of price transparency. The country has to address each of these
issues very seriously to increase its share of world agri-trade. For
a favourable macro-picture, it is crucial that the micro-elements
fall into their proper place. |
| APMCs : The Shifting Role Definition |
This is where APMCs fall into the picture.
APMCs have been set up to regulate the sales of agri-products in their
respective zones. But with the changing global economic order, this
role has to go much beyond mere regulation - these bodies have to
take upon themselves the role of facilitators - they have to encourage
trade, they have to ensure it is done efficiently and they have to
provide adequate infrastructure for doing so. |
In the changed situation, APMCs have to
add more value to the selling process. As already highlighted, there
are too many layers currently between the Indian farmer and the consumer
- APMCs would not like to merely be another layer but be responsible
for creating an environment where the trade is free and fair. The
seller must get a fair price and the buyer must have the freedom of
choice. |
Two steps, which APMCs can take to help
the buyers and sellers, are :
A transparent pricing mechanism, and
An efficient enabling infrastructure |
APMCs will have to realize that in a liberalized
agri-marketing environment, their expanded role will bring in increased
transactions. Apart from this, the single most important factor to
be kept in mind is efficiency of trade. |
A few APMCs such as the ones in Azadpur
(Delhi) and in Bangalore are beginning to realize this paradigm shift
and are taking rectifying measures in time. Information available
from Azadpur APMC web site (http://www.azadpurapmc.com) indicates
that their revenue per trader (RPT) is 0.55 for the year 2000. Azadpur
APMC deals with only fruits and vegetables and the comparable figure
for MAPMC is 0.17, less than one-third. This demonstrates that there
is ample scope for increase in trade volumes as well as efficiency
at MAPMC. |